Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
N Z Med J ; 135(1557): 38-48, 2022 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2147708

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The costs of being a medical student are large and increasing, and many students need to work part-time to meet financial pressures. This study explores the impact that part-time extracurricular paid work during the academic year has on medical student wellbeing, their interactions with the curriculum, and the effect of COVID-19 on work in 2020. METHODS: An online survey in 2020 gathered demographic, quantitative and qualitative information from medical students and their work experiences. Descriptive statistics analysed quantitative data; qualitative data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Of the 36% (n=530) of students who responded, 255 (49%) reported undertaking paid part-time work, with 59 (24%) reporting they would not be able to remain studying if they did not work. When interacting with the medical programme, 43% of students reported their work conflicted with scheduled medical school commitments, and 70% reported conflicts between work and individual study. COVID-19 disrupted 57% of paid work during the year. Impacts on students' wellbeing were both positive and negative. Positive aspects included developing new skills, self-confidence and resilience. Working also provided an escape from the study demands of the medical programme. Negative aspects were predominantly about the increased stress working had on students, specifically on the impact of paid work on their own health. CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of medical students work part-time while studying. Understanding the perceived implications that part-time work has on student education and wellbeing could help medical schools provide appropriate advice and pastoral support for their students.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Students, Medical , COVID-19/epidemiology , Curriculum , Employment , Humans , New Zealand
2.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 31(1): 14-21, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2004185

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: In response to the needs of dementia caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic, the NYU Langone Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Family Support Program (FSP) quickly transitioned to providing most services online. To understand how dementia caregivers experienced FSP services after the switch to video telehealth, we conducted qualitative interviews of spouse or partner dementia caregivers. PARTICIPANTS: Ten participants were recruited from a convenience sample of dementia spouse or partner caregivers who used one or more online FSP services offered during the pandemic. DESIGN: Caregivers engaged in semi-structured interviews held via videoconference between May and June 2020. Qualitative analysis of interviews was conducted according to the principles of framework analysis. RESULTS: Caregivers reported high satisfaction with the FSP pre-pandemic and continued to feel supported when services were provided online. They transitioned to video telehealth services with little difficulty. CONCLUSIONS: While video telehealth is frequently cited as beneficial for those in rural communities, socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, or homebound individuals, our findings suggest that video telehealth is also advantageous for dementia caregivers, given their unique barriers, including lack of time due to caregiving responsibilities, lack of respite care for the person with dementia, and the additional burdens of travel time to access in-person services.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dementia , Telemedicine , Humans , Caregivers , Pandemics , Dementia/epidemiology
3.
Alzheimer's & Dementia ; 17(S7):e054509, 2021.
Article in English | Wiley | ID: covidwho-1664370

ABSTRACT

Background Daily routines have been drastically impacted by COVID-19, including healthcare appointments, home services, and many recreational opportunities. Spousal dementia caregivers (CGs) are particularly vulnerable during COVID-19, as many rely on family members, daycare, in-home assistance, and other respite opportunities. We conducted qualitative interviews in May/June 2020 to understand the impact of COVID-19 on dementia CGs and how they experienced the switch of all the NYU ADRD Family Support Program (FSP) services to telehealth. Method A total of 10 spousal CGs participated in videoconference interviews about their COVID-19 experiences and the FSP?s transition to the telehealth format. Semi-structured interviews were conducted by one of two interviewers who were external to the FSP to encourage freedom of discussion. All sessions were recorded and transcribed. De-identified transcripts were coded by two independent coders using NVivo, with discrepancies resolved by a third researcher. Result CGs ranged in age from 54 to 86;7 were female, 8 were non-Hispanic White, and 2 were Black. All were New York City residents living with the person with dementia;2 households had additional adult family members. Qualitative analysis revealed several major themes related to COVID-19 experiences: fears surrounding COVID-19 and staying healthy;changes in daily routines;the impact of reduced respite and support services;adaptation to technology that enabled increased contact with family/friends. Feedback about the telehealth adaptation of the FSP included observations about new group dynamics and decreased barriers to involvement due to the ability to participate from home, reducing the need for transportation and other logistics related to traveling. Conclusion Despite significant challenges due to COVID-19, CGs reported benefit and support from the FSP in the new telehealth format. One participant described the FSP as ?indispensable? and expressed how much members relied on each other during COVID-19. In addition, we learned that the telehealth FSP not only served as a source of support during the crisis but that there were perceived advantages to this format, including reductions in barriers to in-person services (finding transportation, travel time, getting respite care for the person with dementia). We recommend continuing the option of telehealth services for dementia CGs after the COVID-19 crisis.

4.
Innovation in aging ; 5(Suppl 1):1037-1038, 2021.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1602336

ABSTRACT

Caring for a person with dementia (PWD) has been consistently associated with negative effects on health, including increases in caregiver depression, anxiety, and burden. Emerging studies have shown that the COVID-19 pandemic has increased these factors due to reported increases in caregiver workload and cognitive and behavioral symptoms of the PWD. We interviewed 10 spousal caregivers of PWD from the NYU Langone Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias Family Support Program in Summer 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic in order to gain feedback about their experiences during the pandemic and the transition from in-person to videoconferencing that could be used to improve services and support. Caregivers discussed the challenges faced during the pandemic but also the unique opportunities the situation presented. We report here on those positive aspects of COVID-19 from the perspective of the caregivers we interviewed. Methods Interviews of caregivers residing with their spouses in the New York City area were conducted via videoconferencing, transcribed, deidentified, and analyzed using framework analysis methods. Results We found that caregivers reported some positive reaction to videoconferencing that included increased support group cohesion, increased convenience, feeling less obligated to participate in events, and new opportunities for social contact. Participants also discussed positive inter-couple relationship changes such as increased quality time spent together. Our findings resonate with a body of literature focused on understanding the positive aspects of caregiving. Understanding the full presentation of the caregiver experience, including both positive and negative aspects, is important for developing interventions and resources for this unique group.

6.
Crit Care Med ; 48(11): e1097-e1101, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-998502

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the impact of obesity on disease severity in patients with coronavirus disease 2019. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study designed to evaluate the association between body mass index and risk of severe disease in patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Data were abstracted from the electronic health record. The primary endpoint was a composite of intubation or death. SETTING: Two hospitals in Massachusetts (one quaternary referral center and one affiliated community hospital). PATIENTS: Consecutive patients hospitalized with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 admitted between March 13, 2020, and April 3, 2020. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 305 patients were included in this study. We stratified patients by body mass index category: < 25 kg/m (54 patients, 18%), ≥ 25 kg/m to < 30 kg/m (124 patients, 41%), ≥ 30 kg/m to < 35 kg/m (58 patients, 19%), and ≥ 35 kg/m (69 patients, 23%). In total, 128 patients (42%) had a primary endpoint (119 patients [39%] were intubated and nine died [3%] without intubation). Sixty-five patients (51%) with body mass index greater than or equal to 30 kg/m were intubated or died. Adjusted Cox models demonstrated that body mass index greater than or equal to 30 kg/m was associated with a 2.3-fold increased risk of intubation or death (95% CI, 1.2-4.3) compared with individuals with body mass index less than 25 kg/m. Diabetes was also independently associated with risk of intubation or death (hazard ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.7). Fifty-six out of 127 patients (44%) with body mass index greater than or equal to 30 kg/m had diabetes, and the combination of both diabetes and body mass index greater than or equal to 30 kg/m was associated with a 4.5-fold increased risk of intubation or death (95% CI, 2.0-10.2) compared with patients without diabetes and body mass index less than 25 kg/m. CONCLUSIONS: Among consecutive patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019, obesity was an independent risk factor for intubation or death.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Critical Illness/mortality , Intubation, Intratracheal/mortality , Obesity/mortality , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Body Mass Index , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/complications , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL